<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Being #1 with &#8220;Untitled Document&#8221; and Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnmu.com/untitled-document/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnmu.com/untitled-document/</link>
	<description>John Mueller's technical website tips and tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Moro</title>
		<link>http://johnmu.com/untitled-document/comment-page-1/#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Moro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmu.com/untitled-document/#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>&quot;I wonder who decided that &quot;untitled document&quot; was better than no title at all?&quot; 

Yes!! I finally can answer one YOUR questions...the culprit is Macromedia I believe. When you create a new page in Dreamweaver (still is the case with Adobe CS3), the title defaults to &quot;Untitled Document.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I wonder who decided that &#8220;untitled document&#8221; was better than no title at all?&#8221; </p>
<p>Yes!! I finally can answer one YOUR questions&#8230;the culprit is Macromedia I believe. When you create a new page in Dreamweaver (still is the case with Adobe CS3), the title defaults to &#8220;Untitled Document.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mueller</title>
		<link>http://johnmu.com/untitled-document/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mueller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmu.com/untitled-document/#comment-339</guid>
		<description>Yep, the competition is pretty low (but it&#039;s still there). Even if you move to something like &quot;toy store seattle wa&quot; (1 mil. results) you will see sites on top, within the local search one-box, that are not listed on the first page of organic results otherwise. 

It would be interesting if Analytics could track clicks from the one-box (or even from specific one-boxes and / or other universal search results) separately. 

Assuming they were on the the first page of organic results as well - do you think the user wuould be more likely to click on the local-search result (name, address + star rating) or on the organic result (title + snippet)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, the competition is pretty low (but it&#8217;s still there). Even if you move to something like &#8220;toy store seattle wa&#8221; (1 mil. results) you will see sites on top, within the local search one-box, that are not listed on the first page of organic results otherwise. </p>
<p>It would be interesting if Analytics could track clicks from the one-box (or even from specific one-boxes and / or other universal search results) separately. </p>
<p>Assuming they were on the the first page of organic results as well &#8211; do you think the user wuould be more likely to click on the local-search result (name, address + star rating) or on the organic result (title + snippet)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malignition.com</title>
		<link>http://johnmu.com/untitled-document/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Malignition.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 03:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnmu.com/untitled-document/#comment-338</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny how some are able to luck out when it comes to SERP rankings. I can&#039;t say that I&#039;m absolutely surprised, the keyword does have low competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how some are able to luck out when it comes to SERP rankings. I can&#8217;t say that I&#8217;m absolutely surprised, the keyword does have low competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.285 seconds -->
