<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Being #1 with &#8220;Untitled Document&#8221; and Flash</title>
	<link>http://johnmu.com/untitled-document/</link>
	<description>John Mueller's technical website tips and tricks</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 01:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam Moro</title>
		<link>http://johnmu.com/untitled-document/#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Moro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 19:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://johnmu.com/untitled-document/#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>"I wonder who decided that "untitled document" was better than no title at all?" 

Yes!! I finally can answer one YOUR questions...the culprit is Macromedia I believe. When you create a new page in Dreamweaver (still is the case with Adobe CS3), the title defaults to "Untitled Document."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I wonder who decided that &#8220;untitled document&#8221; was better than no title at all?&#8221; </p>
<p>Yes!! I finally can answer one YOUR questions&#8230;the culprit is Macromedia I believe. When you create a new page in Dreamweaver (still is the case with Adobe CS3), the title defaults to &#8220;Untitled Document.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mueller</title>
		<link>http://johnmu.com/untitled-document/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mueller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://johnmu.com/untitled-document/#comment-339</guid>
		<description>Yep, the competition is pretty low (but it's still there). Even if you move to something like "toy store seattle wa" (1 mil. results) you will see sites on top, within the local search one-box, that are not listed on the first page of organic results otherwise. 

It would be interesting if Analytics could track clicks from the one-box (or even from specific one-boxes and / or other universal search results) separately. 

Assuming they were on the the first page of organic results as well - do you think the user wuould be more likely to click on the local-search result (name, address + star rating) or on the organic result (title + snippet)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, the competition is pretty low (but it&#8217;s still there). Even if you move to something like &#8220;toy store seattle wa&#8221; (1 mil. results) you will see sites on top, within the local search one-box, that are not listed on the first page of organic results otherwise. </p>
<p>It would be interesting if Analytics could track clicks from the one-box (or even from specific one-boxes and / or other universal search results) separately. </p>
<p>Assuming they were on the the first page of organic results as well - do you think the user wuould be more likely to click on the local-search result (name, address + star rating) or on the organic result (title + snippet)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malignition.com</title>
		<link>http://johnmu.com/untitled-document/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Malignition.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 03:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://johnmu.com/untitled-document/#comment-338</guid>
		<description>It's funny how some are able to luck out when it comes to SERP rankings. I can't say that I'm absolutely surprised, the keyword does have low competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how some are able to luck out when it comes to SERP rankings. I can&#8217;t say that I&#8217;m absolutely surprised, the keyword does have low competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
